We’ve learnt several topics in regard to casing design and this article will demonstrate you how to determine casing size in the well.
Casing size selection is determined from the inside outward and it starts from the bottom hole.
The sequence of design is based on the following steps;
1. Proper sizing of tubing is determined by inflow performance analysis.
2. Completion equipment is planned to install with tubing string. Determine which part has the biggest OD. This will directly impact of production casing.
3. Bit size for drilling the production section.
4. Casing size must be smaller than bit size and its ID must be bigger than the biggest component in completion string.
5. Once you get the last casing string, the upper string is selected by repeating bit selection and casing selection similar to step #3 and #4.
You may need to use the following table (Table 1) to determine bit size and casing size. This is based on API casing therefore if you use special casing, you may need to check with the casing company to give you exact casing ID.
Table 1 – Commonly Used Bit Sizes That Will Pass Through API Casing
Example: According to the previous example, this is the casing design based on pore pressure and fracture gradient (Figure 1).
Figure 1– Casing Design Based On Pore Pressure and Fracture Gradient
The casing string should be set at 3000’ TVD, 6,000’ TVD and 12,000’ TVD.
The Rig needs to drill and set the conductor casing to 500’ TVD in order to rig up the well control equipment.
Completion information
• Tubing string – 3-1/2” tubing
• Completion equipment – TRSV, Side Pocket Mandrel, Packer, etc.
• The biggest size of completion equipment is 5 inch.
According to the Table 1, the bit and casing plan for this well is described below.
Note: this plan is based on size selection only. The load cases are not accounted for in this example.
Production Section
Bit size = 8-1/2”
Casing = 7”, 26 ppf, ID 6.276”
Intermediate Section
Bit size = 12-1/4”
Casing = 9-5/8”, 40 ppf, ID 8.835”
Surface Section
Bit size = 14-3/4”
Casing = 13-3/8”, 48 ppf, ID 12.715”
Conductor Casing
Bit size = 17-1/2”
Casing = 16”, 55 ppf, ID 15.375”
Figure 2 – Casing Details
In order to determine what casing grades to be used in the well, you need do the detailed calculations based on several load cases as burst, collapse, tensile, etc. We will cover the details later on.
References
Jonathan Bellarby, 2009. Well Completion Design, Volume 56 (Developments in Petroleum Science). 1 Edition. Elsevier Science.
Wan Renpu, 2011. Advanced Well Completion Engineering, Third Edition. 3 Edition. Gulf Professional Publishing.
Ted G. Byrom, 2014. Casing and Liners for Drilling and Completion, Second Edition: Design and Application (Gulf Drilling Guides). 2 Edition. Gulf Professional Publishing.
thanks for the information, looking forward to casing size selection based on load cases as burst, collapse, tensile, etc.
I am collecting this information and it will be shared later.
Thank you for the good information.
What i am wondering is that when we use casing and when we use liner.
Why don’t we use liner for the economic reason instead of using casing?
Liners are widely used for several applications and they reduce cost of tubular ass well. You can apply this concept to see how many strings you need and then load calculation must be applied to determine where you can use liners in the well.
Hi very good info, as you mentioned in the post are there any other posts explaining the calculations based on several load cases as burst, collapse, tensile.
pls help
Thank You
We will post information later.
actually i am searching for data which tells me about bit size, corresponding casing size , MWD tool size,and so on if you have some thing like that please send on my email id.
thankyou!